California Employment Agreement Review

Did you work for Oracle, NVIDIA, or Gilead in California?

Employment contracts at these companies may contain restraints on your rights that California law does not permit — noncompete, non-solicitation, or similar restrictions on what you can do after you leave.

If you were employed within the past year, current and former employees alike may have legal recourse.

Call (626) 808-4357

Attorney Advertisement. Matthew B. Hayes, a California-licensed attorney at Hayes Pawlenko LLP in South Pasadena, is responsible for this advertisement. No result is guaranteed.

Free, confidential review

01 / 02

A few quick questions — no cost, no obligation.

Which of the three companies did you work for in the past year?
Are you still employed by the company?

By submitting this form you are requesting a free review of your agreement. Submitting this form does not create an attorney-client relationship. Hayes Pawlenko LLP may contact you by phone, text message, or email about your submission. Consent is not required to obtain legal services. Message and data rates may apply. Reply STOP to opt out.

Attorney Advertisement. No result is guaranteed.

Does this describe your situation?

You may have a claim if:

  • You worked for Oracle, NVIDIA, or Gilead Sciences in California within the past year.
  • You signed an employment, offer, confidentiality, or separation agreement with that company.
  • That agreement limited where you could work, who you could work for, or who you could contact after leaving.
  • No one gave you written notice that such a restriction is void under California law.
What California law says

Most post-employment restraints are void here

California Business and Professions Code section 16600 makes a contract that restrains someone from engaging in a lawful profession, trade, or business void, subject to narrow statutory exceptions. California courts have read it broadly, and it can reach an agreement even where the employee signed it in another state or the contract names another state’s law.

Recent legislation added employee protections

Effective January 1, 2024, California law makes it unlawful to include a void restraint in an employment contract or to attempt to enforce one, and required employers to give written notice to affected current and former employees. An employee may bring an action, and a prevailing employee may recover attorney’s fees and costs.

Whether any particular agreement contains an unlawful restraint depends on its specific terms and the facts of that person’s employment. The review is free and confidential, and there is no obligation.

Free Case Review

Attorney Advertisement

Matthew B. Hayes, California-licensed attorney
Hayes Pawlenko LLP

1414 Fair Oaks Avenue, Unit 2B
South Pasadena, CA 91030
(626) 808-4357

This website is not affiliated with, sponsored by, or endorsed by Oracle Corporation, NVIDIA Corporation, or Gilead Sciences, Inc., or any related entity. Those companies are named only to identify the employers this inquiry concerns. No assertion is made that any of them has violated any law; any such allegation would have to be proven.

This website is an Attorney Advertisement operated and paid for by Hayes Pawlenko LLP. Matthew B. Hayes, a California-licensed attorney at 1414 Fair Oaks Avenue, Unit 2B, South Pasadena, CA 91030, is responsible for its content. It is provided for general informational purposes only and is not legal advice. Submitting this form does not create an attorney-client relationship; an attorney-client relationship is formed only through a written agreement signed by both the client and the firm.

No result is guaranteed, and prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Whether any person has a claim depends on the specific terms of that person's agreement and the facts of their employment. This advertisement is directed to individuals who worked in California. No advertising is intended in any jurisdiction where this website fails to comply with applicable law and regulations.